Which organization has been mentioned as taking action against GNC?

The mention of Oregon's attorney general reflects the increasing scrutiny and regulatory actions taken against supplement retailers to ensure consumer safety and adherence to laws governing dietary supplements. The attorney general's office investigates claims of false advertising or misleading practices, which can be crucial for maintaining industry integrity. Specifically, the action against GNC indicates legal measures aimed at holding the company accountable for its marketing and manufacturing practices.

In this context, while organizations like the FDA and Health Canada play significant roles in regulating dietary supplements, the specific reference to the attorney general emphasizes local or state-level enforcement actions pertaining to consumer protection laws. The NSF, known for its certification programs ensuring product safety and quality, is relevant in broader supplement conversations but does not typically engage in enforcement actions against organizations like GNC in the same manner. Thus, the choice highlighting Oregon's attorney general captures the specific regulatory environment affecting GNC.